I read Toniic's new eGuide to Early Stage Impact Investing yesterday and was happy to see that it is full of helpful and specific information about how to do this very important work. In contrast to some impact investing guides which operate at an more poetic level, this guide is really wired to answer very concrete questions and describes a clear process from theory of change to evaluation.
It focuses on early stage investing, but the framework is applicable to all impact investing.
http://www.toniic.com/toniic-institute/early-stage-e-guide/
Wednesday, November 27, 2013
Monday, November 25, 2013
White House Update on Pay for Success
Jonathan Greenblatt's recent post from the White House's Center for Social Innovation and Civic Participation is a good summary of the federal government's current approach to pay for success (PFS) aka social impact bonds. The relatively slow rollout of PFS also highlights the challenges of leading from the top for an instrument which is typically built on local service provision.
Building a Smarter, More Efficient Government through “Pay for Success” | The White House
Building a Smarter, More Efficient Government through “Pay for Success” | The White House
Sunday, November 24, 2013
Is Coal the New Tobacco for Shareholder Engagement?
The divestment movement among shareholders is now targeting fossil fuels as a new category of (environmental) sin stocks. Although climate change legislation seems dead in the water, a new movement is calling for institutional investors to divest from fossil fuels. As the proverbial long-term investors, pension funds and endowments are increasingly moving away from dirty fuels - not an easy thing to do within traditional asset allocation models.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-20/coal-seen-as-new-tobacco-sparking-investor-backlash-commodities.html
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-20/coal-seen-as-new-tobacco-sparking-investor-backlash-commodities.html
Monday, November 18, 2013
New Entrants Coming to the Social Impact Bond Market
Jessica Toonkel from Reuters outlines the latest news from the SIB market as new players and transactions begin to compete with Goldman Sachs in this new sector.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/sns-rt-us-goldman-social-impact-bond-analysis-20131112,0,5959128.story?page=1
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/sns-rt-us-goldman-social-impact-bond-analysis-20131112,0,5959128.story?page=1
Friday, November 15, 2013
NASDAQ for Nonprofits
How can nonprofits most efficiently raise capital? This ongoing debate continues as the NYT mixes aggregating capital for non-profits with pay for success financings.
Monday, November 4, 2013
Sunday, November 3, 2013
Sunday, October 20, 2013
Friday, October 4, 2013
Friday, September 27, 2013
Monday, September 23, 2013
Thursday, September 12, 2013
Monday, September 2, 2013
Is the Tragedy of the Commons Really a Tragedy?
The FT's Tim Harford highlights two sides of a very important academic debate on how we can address environmental issues. He compares Garrett Hardin's 1958 "Tragedy of the Commons" approach to Lin Ostrom's focus on how communities solve the challenges of sharing resources by creating systems and rules.
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/afc5377e-1026-11e3-a258-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2dk2XoC4A
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/afc5377e-1026-11e3-a258-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2dk2XoC4A
Tuesday, August 20, 2013
Is there a hierarchy of goodness in public policy?
Melissa Berman of Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors makes clear the challenges of using philanthropy for large social change.
But specifically because philanthropy is personal and voluntary, it may supplement - but cannot replace - the rigorous, messy public debate we need in a democracy to decide how we as citizens want to choose between museums and fighting blindness.
Too often, private philanthropy is used to drive the allocation of public resources.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/20/opinion/in-charitable-giving-no-hierarchy-of-goodness.html?smid=pl-share
But specifically because philanthropy is personal and voluntary, it may supplement - but cannot replace - the rigorous, messy public debate we need in a democracy to decide how we as citizens want to choose between museums and fighting blindness.
Too often, private philanthropy is used to drive the allocation of public resources.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/20/opinion/in-charitable-giving-no-hierarchy-of-goodness.html?smid=pl-share
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)